Eggdev: Re: [eggheads-patches] PATCH1.5: eggdrop1.5+doc-changes-20001006.diff.gz
tothwolf at concentric.net
Sat Oct 7 11:29:13 CST 2000
On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Fabian Knittel wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 12:13:49AM -0500, Tothwolf wrote:
> > On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Fabian Knittel wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 02:06:41AM -0500, Tothwolf wrote:
> > > > eggdrop1.5+doc-changes-20001006.diff.gz:
> > > > converted UPDATES* files to all use the same format
> > >
> > > It would have been better to ask before changing the current
> > > format though. The ``2-character indention of descriptions spanning
> > > over more than one lines''-style is what we decided on some time
> > > ago. Or to be precise, dw came up with the idea and we agreed that
> > > it makes it easier to read the updates file.
> > It makes them harder to read,
> I disagree.
*shrug* I've been trying to come up with a better format overall, but
really haven't come up with one yet...Seems like our current format is
"difficult" just due to its design.
> > the that "format" can't be preserved when
> > converted to DocBook or HTML.
> I've never seen a DocBook'ed changelog before. Is it necessary?
I don't know if I'd go so far as DocBook *yet*...but HTML might be nice...
Again, perhaps a whole new format is in order, one which can be dumped
into a file at release time...
More information about the Eggdev